The coordinator of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Libya, Ramadan Boukrain, rejected the decision issued by the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Court, today, Monday, which rejects the appeal submitted by Dr. Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi.
He said in exclusive statements to “Og”: “Before 2011, we did not have full confidence in any institution affiliated with the Security Council, or the United Nations that includes all countries, because there are major countries that control the scene.”
“Bugrain” continued: “This matter increased after 2011 AD, as all values collapsed, and the balance of justice also collapsed, and there is control over the unjust forces that messed with the fate of the Libyan citizen, who terrorized and killed citizens on a daily basis.”
He continued: “The International Criminal Court, has proven that it is politicized and has nothing to do with justice and law, as it took its legitimacy from the Ministry of Justice in the government of accord, so the representative of the” Ministry of Justice in the government of reconciliation “in the International Criminal is the one who gave legitimacy to this court and waived Libyan sovereignty and the prestige of the Libyan judiciary.
And Bougrain added: “International criminal is not based on legitimacy, and we have not signed any agreement with it and do not recognize it, especially since the hostile countries exploit it to conquer the small peoples who love peace and freedom, and we were not surprised by the ruling today on the sword of Islam.”
“Bugrain” continued: “Saif al-Islam is a Libyan citizen, and the case is authentic to the Libyan judiciary. How can the government of reconciliation concede this right? All governments clash with other countries in order not to hand over their citizens, so what is this absurdity, cowardice and indecency?”, And what happened from the “Ministry of Justice in the government of accord “indicates the absence of sovereignty and respect for the judiciary, and respect for the Libyans and their feelings.”
He narrated: “In the Lockerbie case, Libya refused to extradite its children to the United States, and insisted on trying its children in a neutral country away from America, and this was already done. This is sovereignty. And he has a tendency to get Libya out of this dark tunnel, and rather the international courts consider the tragedy of Libya, and the crimes committed against the Libyans, from displacement, abuse, and theft of their money.
by this behavior that it is not worth anything, and has neglected the sovereignty of Libya and the judiciary, to cut the path before Dr. Saif al-Islam to lead the political stage, and to work for Libya, so Islam is a Libyan citizen who has the right to lead interests and participate in work Politician, his supporters and his lovers with him heart and mind and will die in front of them. ”
Today, Monday, the International Criminal Court ruled that it is entitled to continue the trial of Saif al-Islam Muammar al-Gaddafi because of al-Sarraj’s claims that the General Amnesty Law does not apply to him and that final judgments have not been issued by the Libyan judiciary against him.
The International Criminal announced, a few days ago, that an order to set a date for the ruling will be delivered in the appeal of Dr. Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi against the decision of the Pre-Trial Chamber on Monday 9 March 2020.
And Dr. Saif Al-Islam Al-Gaddafi is being tried on charges that his defense refuted before the Libyan courts and before the International Criminal Court before, and you get a legal amnesty, and Libya is not a member of the court.
The Ministry of Justice of the internationally-backed government of accord backed back steps after a campaign of criticism that it was subjected to by its “shameful” claim, as described by many law experts, the International Criminal Court to try Dr. Saif al-Islam al-Gaddafi, who received a general amnesty issued by the House of Representatives, which is the legislative body entrusted to .
The shame in the ministry’s retreat is that it violates the visual recording of the hearings that took place inside the International Criminal Court at its headquarters in The Hague, over the past Monday and Tuesday, claiming in a statement, today, Saturday, seen by “Og”, that it never accepts the jurisdiction of any other court to try any A Libyan citizen, whatever his political orientations.
In its statement describing Saif al-Islam as “Mr.” instead of the word “accused,” which the Minister repeated before the court, the Ministry stated that her presence before the International Criminal forced him to comply with Security Council Resolution 1970, adding that she had previously contested international justice in the case of the Director of the Military Intelligence Department Former Libyan Brigadier General Abdullah Al-Senussi, she was able to emerge from this conflict in recognition of the International Criminal Court, the ability of the national judiciary to try Al-Senussi fairly according to international standards.
She claimed that her recent appearance before the International Criminal Court on the 12th and 13th of November this year in The Hague confirms the jurisdiction of the Libyan judiciary with regard to the accusations attributed to Saif al-Islam, and that he has already walked into this trial and that he is able to continue in it, and that the Libyan judiciary has not yet exhausted its jurisdiction over it, claiming that it It is not acceptable for anyone to escape punishment or to try to subdue laws in a way that excludes them from their content, according to the statement.
She also claimed that Saif al-Islam’s defense attempt tried to derive the amnesty law No. 6 of 2015, from its content and cover up its provisions to stop the prosecution of him without meeting the conditions stipulated in the law to grant the amnesty and without waiting for his report from the competent Libyan judicial authorities, which leads to losing the wisdom of its approval It is wasted by the reconciliation efforts that the legislator decided to achieve through the provisions of this law, according to the statement.
The Ministry stated that it could not tolerate what it called “legal fallacies” in violation of the rules of trial in the criminal articles relating to the description of the ruling against Saif al-Islam issued by the Criminal Court of the Tripoli Court of Appeals, which was defensive and was not in his favor.
The Ministry of Justice called on the government of Accord, Saif al-Islam’s defense – if he is serious about his proposition and really believes in the entitlement of his client to a general amnesty – to push this before the national judiciary and prove the availability of conditions for granting amnesty to their client as the only authority competent to apply this law, as he claimed, given that the door Still open.