Fayez Al-Uraibi, media secretary for the Benghazi Popularity, said earlier that the whole world knows that the International Criminal Court is primarily politicized, and that there are humanitarian cases in the world. This court has not been able to open these files.
He continued, in exclusive statements to “Og”: “When we talk about humanitarian files and war crimes, committed in many parts of the world, we mean Zionist violations against the Palestinians, because this court was unable to open the files of human rights violations, in Iraq.”
Al-Uraibi added: “The Security Council is the one who referred Dr. Saif Al-Islam’s file to the International Criminal Court, and all the accusations received against him by the Security Council are malicious accusations, and part of the aggression against Libya since 2011, and therefore the aim of this measure was to distort the historical leadership of the Al-Fateh Revolution. And attempts to distort Saif al-Islam, within the framework of that stage that witnessed the aggression against Libya, which took many forms, whether political, military, media or human rights. ”
He continued: “This court is tasked with chasing the historic leaders of nations and national leaders, and serving the project of dismantling the unity of peoples and homelands, and all that the International Criminal has built on its so-called accusations, are just media marketing, and events have proven that everything that was marketed and upon which the Security Council built its decisions, are just lies And distortion, and many American presidents admitted, that everything that happened in 2011, like a failed political adventure that did not produce any positive side for Libya’s interest.
Al-Uraibi continued: “When we see the opinions of jurists and academics in the law, we find that they agreed that the International Criminal Court is a politicized court, and we trust that all these accusations are false, and what the militia government committed in Tripoli, when it proceeded to hand over the prestige of the Libyan judiciary to the International Criminal His prestige, which is the government that claims the civil state and that it is a state of law, has proven that it is not a human government and has overstated the honor of the Libyan judiciary, and this is unfortunate if the political decline comes to compromise the prestige of the Libyan judiciary.
He narrated: “The international criminal is lacking credibility, politicized and chooses and intentionally offends small and vulnerable countries, or countries under guardianship of the major countries. The sword of Islam is a national symbol, and it has a very broad popular ground, and they want to prolong the crisis, and they know very well that the key to a solution in Libya is Saif al-Islam, with its overwhelming popular acceptance, and therefore they want to perpetuate the crisis, and to continue in this situation that is currently in Libya, and try to disrupt the path of solution and national reconciliation in Libya, and to avoid Libya’s exit from this fierce vortex, which has occurred since 2011.
Al-Uraibi narrated: “The Libyan masses will face these measures with more challenge, and Saif Al-Islam will insist on continuing the struggle for the cause of his people, and international criminal will not intimidate him, and he will not be able to exercise injustice because there is a true national will that can confront it, and counterfeit these false allegations that were built in vain.” , Anti-Libya since 2011, which events proved to be mere lies that could not be conclusive evidence to condemn the mass regime in Libya, the leader of the revolution, and Saif al-Islam.
He elaborated: “The government of accord is merely a militia government, and its actions were taken, through the Minister of Justice of Accord, and its delegate to the International Criminal Court. It is not strange, because those who supported NATO in its aggression against Libya, and therefore it is not strange for them to overstate Libya’s sovereignty, and it is legally recognized that he was tried in the national judiciary, he cannot be tried again before any international judiciary.
And Al-Uraibi added in his statement: “The International Criminal Court has struck with this international legal rule, has come to a wall, and wants to try Saif al-Islam again, even though he has been tried in Libya. Political isolation, and what happens are just attempts, fear and terror from the tools of conspiracy against Libya, and from the role that many see as being pivotal and capable of dealing with the Libyan crisis through the national role.
He concluded: “These forces are trying to conspire against the national role of the sword of Islam, and abort this role, and they may have many gains at the expense of the security and safety of the Libyan people, the Libyan people’s wealth and money that are wasted every day, as lives and blood flow everywhere, and chaos is overwhelming. Also, Libya has become a homeland for terrorism, and these measures are aimed at removing Saif al-Islam from every national role, after the political tools that occupied the Libyan political scene for the past 9 years failed, and they proved to be puppet powers and did not provide what benefits the country, and what benefits the Libyan people.
Today, Monday, the International Criminal Court ruled that it is entitled to continue the trial of Saif al-Islam Muammar al-Gaddafi because of al-Sarraj’s claims that the General Amnesty Law does not apply to him and that final judgments have not been issued by the Libyan judiciary against him.
The International Criminal announced, a few days ago, that an order to set a date for the ruling will be delivered in the appeal of Dr. Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi against the decision of the Pre-Trial Chamber on Monday 9 March 2020.
And Dr. Saif Al-Islam Al-Gaddafi is being tried on charges that his defense refuted before the Libyan courts and before the International Criminal Court before, and you get a legal amnesty, and Libya is not a member of the court.
The Ministry of Justice of the internationally-backed government of accord backed back steps after a campaign of criticism that it was subjected to by its “shameful” claim, as described by many law experts, the International Criminal Court to try Dr. Saif al-Islam al-Gaddafi, who received a general amnesty issued by the House of Representatives, which is the legislative body entrusted to .
The shame in the ministry’s retreat is that it violates the visual recording of the hearings that took place inside the International Criminal Court at its headquarters in The Hague, over the past Monday and Tuesday, claiming in a statement, today, Saturday, seen by “Og”, that it never accepts the jurisdiction of any other court to try any A Libyan citizen, whatever his political orientations.
In its statement describing Saif al-Islam as “Mr.” instead of the word “accused,” which the Minister repeated before the court, the Ministry stated that her presence before the International Criminal forced him to comply with Security Council Resolution 1970, adding that she had previously contested international justice in the case of the Director of the Military Intelligence Department Former Libyan Brigadier General Abdullah Al-Senussi, she was able to emerge from this conflict in recognition of the International Criminal Court, the ability of the national judiciary to try Al-Senussi fairly according to international standards.
She claimed that her recent appearance before the International Criminal Court on the 12th and 13th of November this year in The Hague confirms the jurisdiction of the Libyan judiciary with regard to the accusations attributed to Saif al-Islam, and that he has already walked into this trial and that he is able to continue in it, and that the Libyan judiciary has not yet exhausted its jurisdiction over it, claiming that it It is not acceptable for anyone to escape punishment or to try to subdue laws in a way that excludes them from their content, according to the statement.
She also claimed that Saif al-Islam’s defense attempt tried to derive the amnesty law No. 6 of 2015, from its content and cover up its provisions to stop the prosecution of him without meeting the conditions stipulated in the law to grant the amnesty and without waiting for his report from the competent Libyan judicial authorities, which leads to losing the wisdom of its approval It is wasted by the reconciliation efforts that the legislator decided to achieve through the provisions of this law, according to the statement.
The Ministry stated that it could not tolerate what it called “legal fallacies” in violation of the rules of trial in the criminal articles relating to the description of the ruling against Saif al-Islam issued by the Criminal Court of the Tripoli Court of Appeals, which was defensive and was not in his favor.
The Ministry of Justice called on the government of Accord, Saif al-Islam’s defense – if he is serious about his proposition and really believes in the entitlement of his client to a general amnesty – to push this before the national judiciary and prove the availability of conditions for granting amnesty to their client as the only authority competent to apply this law, as he claimed, given that the door Still open.